The Netflix empire is growing in an overwhelming and unstoppable way. Nowadays, not being subscribed to the paid TV platform is practically like not having an internet connection. Netflix has evolved from a company that started by selling DVDs by mail to a production machine in almost every TV and film format imaginable. These years of growth have coincided with a shift in viewers/consumers' habits and customs, shaping the current landscape of production and distribution. Viewers are not going to the movies, or not in the way they used to. Now, they prefer to stay at home and enjoy the best content from the comfort of their sofa.
Television networks have interpreted this change as an enhancement in the quality of TV series. Actors, technicians, and highly talented filmmakers have transitioned from the big screen to the small screen, ensuring that viewers eagerly anticipate going home to enjoy the latest episode of their favorite series. This unstoppable process has led to the emergence of platforms that not only allow you to watch these products at any time but have also started producing their own content. It sounds like overwhelming logic, right?
Netflix remains an empire, like any television network, major film studio, or business group with interests. So, why all this controversy? The Cannes Film Festival has selected two titles produced by Netflix to compete, and just like all titles on the platform, they will not have a theatrical release but will premiere directly on TV screens. But are all films currently released in theaters? The answer is no. The number of products available far surpasses the number of theaters and moviegoers. Almodóvar, one of the directors highly respected and admired, who also serves as the President of the Jury at the Festival, has already shared his opinion: "It would be a paradox and a tragedy if the winner of the Palme d'Or or any other award is never seen on the big screen." He is right. Yet, it is also a tragedy that many award-winning films, both in Cannes and other major festivals, never get a theatrical release and are almost impossible to see. That is a real tragedy.
The mission of the Cannes Film Festival is to bring the best films from the festival into competition, and apparently that's what they did. Following the controversy, a law was introduced prohibiting films that have not been released in theaters from competing at the festival. What will happen when most films made by renowned filmmakers are produced by platforms like Netflix? What will happen when Almodóvar can't find traditional financing and has the opportunity to produce his film in this way? Perhaps the solution lies in creating exclusive film festivals for these productions, but it would be a pity if prestigious awards like the Palme d'Or did not go to the most important films of the year. The clash between the old and the new, an age-old debate that persists until the new is no longer new. Something that will surely happen eventually. Whatever the case, the most important thing is that both established and emerging directors have the chance to continue working and making their films under the best possible conditions. And in this, new solutions like Netflix can be useful, or so it seems
